---
title: "Anthropic Proposes U.S. Bill Allowing Developers to Decide When AI Becomes Too Dangerous"
description: "Anthropic has introduced a bill in the U.S. Congress allowing developers and independent assessors to determine AI model risk levels and limit state interference in their release."
date: 2026-10-21T11:27:56.070Z
lang: en
url: https://xab.info/en/posts/anthropic-proposes-bill-ai-regulation
tags: [anthropic, ai-regulation, us-congress, artificial-intelligence, ai-safety]
author: "Alexander Buran"
publisher: "XAB.info"
---

# Anthropic Proposes U.S. Bill Allowing Developers to Decide When AI Becomes Too Dangerous

![An Anthropic executive in a business suit gestures while speaking in front of the company logo](https://xab.info/media/2026/10/21/anthropic-predlozhila-zakonoproekt-o-regulyacii-ii/anthropic-predlozhila-zakonoproekt-o-regulyacii-ii-1.webp)

## Key Points

- Anthropic submitted a bill to U.S. lawmakers limiting state blocking of AI models to cases of "foreseeable and imminent risk."
- Safety analysis would be entrusted to independent assessors accredited by the U.S. Department of Commerce, with a 72-hour notification requirement.
- The bill establishes a single federal standard instead of state laws, triggering congressional debate and criticism over potential conflicts of interest.

Anthropic, a leading developer of generative artificial intelligence, has submitted its own bill to U.S. lawmakers that, according to its authors, is designed to let developers independently determine when AI becomes too dangerous and limit government interference in laboratory decisions. According to the submitted documents, the government would only be able to block the release or use of developments in the event of a "foreseeable and imminent risk," rather than at the whim of bureaucrats.

### The Essence of the Proposed Regulation

The draft law proposes entrusting safety analysis to "independent assessors" accredited by the U.S. Department of Commerce. AI laboratories would be able to pay for the services of these experts, provided that their fees do not depend on the outcome of the assessment. If the assessors record a catastrophic risk, they are required to notify the Department of Commerce within 72 hours.

### Courts Instead of Bureaucrats

Upon receiving the notification, the agency must apply to a federal court in Washington, as the document explicitly prohibits any federal agencies or officials from blocking the development or release of models at their own discretion. According to reports, this provision was introduced after the U.S. government suddenly blocked access to two of Anthropic's advanced models in the summer due to strict export controls.

### A Single Standard and Congressional Debate

The bill also provides for the repeal of individual state laws, thereby establishing a single federal standard nationwide. This has sparked fierce debate in Congress, with some Democrats fearing that a unified law will weaken stricter norms already enacted in California and New York.

### Criticism from Both Sides

The company's initiative has faced criticism from both sides. Skeptics note that the system of lab-funded assessors creates a conflict of interest, and the proposed criteria for catastrophic risk—50 fatalities or billions in damages—sidestep current issues, such as autonomous website hacking, which AI agents are already facing today.

## Fact-Check & Sources

- [Смерть 50 человек или миллиард убытков: Anthropic придумала критерии бана ИИ](https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/smert-50-lyudey-chi-milyard-zbitkiv-anthropic-1792575089.html) - Single source; describes the contents of the proposed bill, the independent assessor mechanism, the 72-hour notification, federal court appeal, repeal of state laws, and criticism of the initiative. The document is a proposal, not enacted law.

## FAQ

### What does Anthropic's bill propose?

To entrust AI safety evaluation to independent assessors accredited by the U.S. Department of Commerce and allow model release to be blocked only through a federal court under a "foreseeable and imminent risk," rather than bureaucratic discretion.

### Why did the court appeal provision appear?

According to reports, after the U.S. government suddenly blocked access to two advanced Anthropic models in the summer due to export restrictions.

### What is the essence of the criticism against the initiative?

Skeptics point to a conflict of interest arising from labs paying the assessors and note that the risk criteria (50 fatalities or billions in damages) do not cover current problems like autonomous website hacking.