--- title: "Attack on An-124 in Leipzig: Drone with Semtex Crashed into Fuel Tank, but Did Not Explode" description: "🚨 Attack on An-124 in Leipzig: Drone with Semtex Crashed into Aircraft Wing, but Did Not Explode. German Authorities Call It a \"New Level of Danger.\" Antonov Airlines Refutes Rumors of Ammunition Transport. #Antonov #Leipzig #Security #Ukraine #Germany" date: 2026-08-10T08:44:00.000Z lang: en url: https://xab.info/en/posts/attack-on-an-124-in-leipzig-drone-with-semtex-crashed-into-aircraft-wing tags: [ukraine-war, antonov, leipzig-airport, security, fpv-drone, semtex] publisher: "XAB.info" --- # Attack on An-124 in Leipzig: Drone with Semtex Crashed into Fuel Tank, but Did Not Explode ![Antonov An-124-100-150 with 'BE BRAVE LIKE KHERSON' slogan parked at Leipzig airport — the aircraft targeted by a drone carrying Semtex that failed to detonate](https://xab.info/media/2026/08/10/ataka-na-an-124-v-leypcige-dron-s-semtex-vrezalsya-v-krylo-samoleta/ataka-na-an-124-v-leypcige-dron-s-semtex-vrezalsya-v-krylo-samoleta-1.webp) ## 🎯 Key Points - A drone with Semtex crashed into the wing of an An-124 in the fuel tank zone, but did not explode. - The attack was targeted, not just a warning. - Antonov Airlines refuted rumors about transporting ammunition. - German authorities declared a new level of hybrid threat. On August 10, 2026, exactly five years after the start of the full-scale war, the world continues to face new forms of hybrid threats. The focus once again turned to Leipzig/Halle Airport, which has become a key hub for the Ukrainian airline Antonov. On the night of August 5, an incident occurred there, which German authorities called a "new level of danger." An FPV drone packed with Semtex plastic explosive rammed the wing of the strategic cargo aircraft An-124 "Ruslan". ### Targeted Attack on the Fuel System An investigation conducted by journalists allowed for the refutation of the initial version that the incident might have been merely a "warning." Analysis of the damage showed that the impact hit the aircraft's wing, specifically in the area of the fuel tanks. This indicates that the goal of the attack was not just to create a diversion, but to destroy an expensive strategic asset and possibly ignite the aviation fuel, which would have led to catastrophic consequences for the airport infrastructure. The key factor that prevented a catastrophe was that the explosive device, for unknown reasons, did not detonate upon impact. The drone, having performed its function as a ram, fell to the ground. It was discovered four hours after the attack entirely by chance — a tour bus driver noticed a suspicious object, stepped on it, and immediately notified the airport security service. ### Refutation of Rumors About Ammunition Transport In the first hours after the incident, rumors began to spread in German media that the Ukrainian An-124 was allegedly transporting ammunition. There were also reports that the drone might have collided with another unmanned aerial vehicle in the air. However, Antonov Airlines categorically refuted these versions. Representatives of the carrier emphasized that at the time of the attack, the aircraft was empty and carried no cargo on board. This confirms that the attack was directed at the aircraft itself as a symbol of Ukrainian logistics and industry, rather than at a specific shipment of cargo. ### Contradictory Data There is a significant gap between the official position of the German authorities and the interpretation of events in the media space. The head of the German Ministry of the Interior, Alexander Dobrindt, spoke of a "hybrid threat scenario" and a "new level of danger," emphasizing that the airport had become a target for sabotage. At the same time, local media, in an attempt to find context for the attack, speculated on the topic of military logistics, claiming that the aircraft could have been part of an arms supply chain. Antonov Airlines insists on the civilian status of the flight and the absence of cargo, which makes the version of a "military target" for the attack controversial, although it does not exclude the strategic nature of the strike against infrastructure. ### Consequences for Airport Security The incident in Leipzig led to a temporary suspension of airfield operations. This event was a shock for German authorities, considering that Leipzig/Halle Airport is a regular base for Ukrainian cargo operations. The fact of using an FPV drone capable of covering significant distances and carrying powerful explosives requires a review of security protocols at all key logistics hubs in Europe. The accidental discovery of the device by a bus driver only highlights how complex the task of protecting objects from asymmetric threats has become. ## ❓ FAQ ### Q: What happened at Leipzig Airport? **A:** An FPV drone with Semtex explosives crashed into the wing of a Ukrainian An-124 aircraft, but did not explode. ### Q: Was the aircraft carrying ammunition? **A:** No, Antonov Airlines refuted this, stating that the aircraft was empty. ### Q: Who found the drone? **A:** The drone was found by chance by a tour bus driver 4 hours after the attack.