--- title: "China Surpasses US in Science Spending: 2024 Statistics Mark a Shift in the Tech Race" description: "πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ China surpasses US in science spending: in 2024, the PRC invested $615 billion, showing a 13.1% growth. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ The US spent $604 billion, focusing on AI. πŸ“Š Japan is in third place with $140 billion. πŸ“‰ US sanctions pushed China towards import substitution in electronics. #Science #China #USA #Technology" date: 2026-08-09T13:30:38.000Z lang: en url: https://xab.info/en/posts/china-surpasses-us-in-science-spending-2024 tags: [china, usa, science, technology, research, budget, nikkei, artificial-intelligence] publisher: "XAB.info" --- # China Surpasses US in Science Spending: 2024 Statistics Mark a Shift in the Tech Race ![Scientist and student in a lab studying a plant, symbolizing scientific research and technological progress in China](https://xab.info/media/2026/08/09/kitay-obognal-ssha-po-raskhodam-na-nauku-2024/kitay-obognal-ssha-po-raskhodam-na-nauku-2024-1.webp) ## 🎯 Key Points - China surpassed the US in science spending in 2024, directing $615 billion compared to $604 billion for the US. - China's spending growth was 13.1%, while the US growth was 6.7%. - Chinese companies invested $478 billion, focusing on electronics and optical equipment. - In the US, half of the R&D spending went to the development of artificial intelligence systems. - The 2022 sanctions became a catalyst for accelerated import substitution in China. In the modern geopolitical and technological race for global leadership, funding for research and development (R&D) plays a key role. According to the latest data published by Nikkei Asian Review, the People's Republic of China (PRC) has officially surpassed the United States of America in terms of spending on science and development. This historical turning point is recorded for the end of 2024, when Chinese companies and universities invested 13.1% more in research than the previous year, reaching a figure of $615 billion in current prices. ### Statistical Turning Point and Growth Dynamics Statistics collected by Japanese analysts, taking into account about 160 indicators, demonstrate Beijing's confident leadership. While China showed double-digit growth in spending, the US, which holds second place, demonstrated a more modest increase of 6.7%, directing a total of $604 billion to science. Third place in this global ranking is held by Japan with spending of $140 billion and growth of 8.4%. It is followed by Germany ($116 billion), South Korea ($97 billion), the UK ($68 billion), and France ($56 billion). It is important to note that this is not a single case of superiority: China surpassed the US in the number of scientific publications as early as 2017, and by 2019 it emerged as a leader among the top 1% of most cited scientific works. ### Spending Structure: Import Substitution vs. AI An analysis of the spending structure reveals fundamental differences in the strategies of the two superpowers. In China, about $478 billion of the total amount was provided directly by companies. Priority areas included computer technology, electronics, and optics, where spending grew by 13%. Experts link this surge to the sanctions imposed by the US in 2022. Restrictions on access to Western technologies pushed Beijing towards accelerated import substitution and the creation of its own technological base, which required colossal investments in manufacturing and engineering sectors. ### Differences in Approaches to Innovation Unlike China, American companies in 2024 focused primarily on non-manufacturing areas. Half of the amount spent on R&D in the US was absorbed by developments in the field of artificial intelligence systems. This indicates that Washington is betting on software and algorithmic superiority, while Beijing is investing in "hardware" and the material base of technologies. The gap in approaches may have long-term consequences: China is striving for technological autonomy in production, while the US dominates in the creation of intellectual platforms. ### Contradictory Data Although R&D spending statistics clearly indicate China's leadership, there are nuances in interpreting this data. On the one hand, the volume of funding reflects ambitions and state support, but it does not always correlate with the quality of breakthrough discoveries. On the other hand, Western analysts note that China's high spending often goes towards scaling existing technologies, while American investments in AI may lead to a qualitative leap in efficiency. Furthermore, data on company spending may vary depending on the accounting methodology used in different countries, which requires caution when directly comparing absolute figures. ### Prospects of the Technological Race The change in leadership in science spending marks a new stage in global competition. China, having bridged the gap with the US, now has the resources for accelerated development in critically important industries, such as semiconductors and optics. However, the ability to convert these investments into real technological breakthroughs and commercial products will remain the main challenge for Beijing. For the US, the task is to maintain leadership in the field of artificial intelligence and other digital technologies, despite growing pressure from the Chinese economy. ## ❓ FAQ ### Q: How much did China spend on science in 2024? **A:** In 2024, China spent $615 billion on science and research, which is 13.1% more than the previous year. ### Q: Which countries follow China and the US in the science spending ranking? **A:** In third place is Japan ($140 billion), followed by Germany ($116 billion), South Korea ($97 billion), the UK ($68 billion), and France ($56 billion). ### Q: What are China's main R&D spending priorities? **A:** Chinese companies focus on computer technology, electronics, and optics, which is related to the need for import substitution following the 2022 sanctions. ### Q: What is the difference between China's and the US's approach to funding science? **A:** China invests in manufacturing technologies and "hardware," while the US focuses on non-manufacturing areas, such as artificial intelligence.