--- title: "Claude Found a 'New CRISPR,' but Scientists Skeptical of Anthropic’s Breakthrough" description: "Claude AI agents discovered a new enzyme system resembling CRISPR in genomic data, but scientists urge caution before calling it a breakthrough." date: 2026-09-27T10:03:39.000Z lang: en url: https://xab.info/en/posts/claude-found-new-crispr-scientists-skeptical-anthropic tags: [artificial-intelligence, anthropic, claude, crispr, biotechnology, genomics] publisher: "XAB.info" --- # Claude Found a 'New CRISPR,' but Scientists Skeptical of Anthropic’s Breakthrough ![Claude AI agents analyzing genomic data in Anthropic laboratory](https://xab.info/media/2026/09/27/claude-nashyol-noviy-crispr-no-uchyonie-zasomnevalis/claude-nashyol-noviy-crispr-no-uchyonie-zasomnevalis-1.webp) ## 🎯 Key Points - Claude AI discovered an enzyme system with DNA repeats resembling CRISPR in bacteriophage data. - Scientists called the finding preliminary and pointed out the lack of peer review. - Biotech stocks reacted to the news with a drop in market value. - Anthropic acknowledges the preliminary nature of the findings and plans further experiments. Anthropic has made a bold announcement regarding the successful deployment of autonomous Claude AI agents, which reportedly discovered a previously undescribed enzyme system with repeating DNA sequences within bacteriophage genomic data. The structure of the discovered system reportedly bears a remote resemblance to CRISPR, the revolutionary genome-editing technology that earned a Nobel Prize. Following this news, shares of specialized medical and biotech companies, including CRISPR Therapeutics and Editas Medicine, dropped in trading as investors perceived the AI's new achievement as a potential threat or competition to traditional development methods. ### Scientific Community Skepticism and Expert Assessments Despite investor optimism and ambitious statements from developers, many reputable scientists and practitioners greeted the announcement with a healthy dose of caution and skepticism. Researcher and entrepreneur Lucas Harrington openly criticized the company's approach, pointing out that presenting early, intermediate, and poorly understood results as a major scientific breakthrough does a disservice. According to him, finding a pattern in a dataset is only a fraction of the work, while the hardest part—understanding how the enzyme actually works—is yet to be done, making premature claims counterproductive. Anthropic itself partially acknowledged the validity of the criticism, noting that the AI lab's researchers 'do not yet know' the full significance and exact function of the discovered enzyme. Company representatives emphasized that they published the technical report as much to showcase the research methodology itself as the core discovery. Notably, the findings were released via a corporate blog post and a technical paper rather than undergoing independent peer review in an established scientific journal. ### Contradictory Data An analysis of the discourse surrounding the event reveals stark contrasts in how the significance of the discovery is evaluated between commercial entities and the academic community. On one hand, Anthropic and market analysts frame the milestone as a historical turning point where artificial intelligence autonomously took a major step in biology without direct human intervention. On the other hand, independent experts and bioinformaticians argue that this is merely preliminary pattern-matching within existing databases—tools that have existed for years—and attempting to spin it as a massive breakthrough is driven primarily by corporate PR and profit motives. ### AI Potential in Biology and Personnel Context Despite the controversies surrounding the specific discovery, independent experts agree that artificial intelligence holds tremendous potential for analyzing genomic data and advancing bioinformatics. The capability of autonomous agents to process massive volumes of viral and bacterial data could significantly accelerate future discoveries, even if the current announcement proved premature. Adding further weight to Anthropic's initiatives is its talent pool: in June, John Jumper, a Nobel laureate for creating the AlphaFold protein-structure prediction system, joined the company, while Peter H. Yoon, formerly of Nobel laureate Jennifer Doudna's lab, served as the lead author of the study. ## 🔍 Fact-Check Verification - [Claude нашёл «новый CRISPR», но учёные засомневались в значимости открытия Anthropic window-new](https://3dnews.ru/1149093/claude-nashyol-noviy-crispr-no-uchyonie-zasomnevalis-v-znachimosti-otkritiya-anthropic) - Основной источник информации об открытии ИИ Claude и реакции научного сообщества. - [ИИ Claude обнаружил в ДНК неизвестную ранее систему ART: её смысл и назначение совершенно неясны](https://overclockers.ru/blog/Global_Chronicles/show/264799/II-Claude-obnaruzhil-v-DNK-neizvestnuju-ranee-sistemu-ART-ee-smysl-i-naznachenie-sovershenno-neyasny) - Детали о неизвестной природе обнаруженной системы. - [Claude обнаружил ранее неописанную ферментную систему с повторами ДНК, напоминающими CRISPR ...](https://vc.ru/ai/3155617-claude-obnaruzhil-novuyu-fermentnuyu-sistemu) - Дополнительное освещение технического релиза Anthropic. - [Anthropic выпустила Claude 3](https://habr.com/ru/news/798081/) - Контекст развития языковых моделей компании. ## ❓ FAQ ### Q: What exactly did Claude AI discover? **A:** AI agents discovered a previously undescribed enzyme system with repeating DNA sequences in bacteriophage genomic data, bearing similarities to CRISPR. ### Q: Why are scientists cautious about the discovery? **A:** Experts note that the function of the enzyme is not yet understood, results lack peer review, and presenting intermediate data as a major breakthrough is premature.