---
title: "Iran calls on Arab monarchies to abandon US military bases: new security strategy in the Persian Gulf"
description: "Iran has officially called on Arab monarchies to abandon US military bases, calling them a factor of destabilization. Tehran has outlined its \"red lines\" and proposed creating a security system without Western participation. 🚀🛑 #Iran #PersianGulf #Geopolitics"
date: 2026-06-26T17:39:42.000Z
lang: en
url: https://xab.info/en/posts/iran-calls-on-arab-monarchies-to-abandon-us-military-bases
tags: []
publisher: "XAB.info"
---

# Iran calls on Arab monarchies to abandon US military bases: new security strategy in the Persian Gulf

![Iranian flag waving against the sky: symbol of national stance on rejecting US military bases in the Persian Gulf](https://xab.info/media/2026/06/26/iran-prizval-arabskie-monarkhii-otkazatsya-ot-voennykh-baz-ssha/iran-prizval-arabskie-monarkhii-otkazatsya-ot-voennykh-baz-ssha-1.webp)

### Tehran demands a review of neighbors' defense strategy

A sharp appeal has been issued in Iran to the states of the Persian Gulf, which could alter the balance of power in the region. Ibrahim Azizi, Chairman of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Islamic Consultative Assembly (parliament) of Iran, officially called on Arab monarchies to reconsider the formats of defense cooperation with Washington. The focus is on the risks associated with the long-term military presence of the United States.

The statement was made against the backdrop of intense diplomatic activity. Consultations on the parameters of shipping security continue in the region, however, Tehran offers its own perspective on the situation, which radically diverges from the current status quo.

### US bases as a factor of destabilization

The key thesis of Ibrahim Azizi's speech boils down to the fact that the deployment of United States military bases on the territory of regional countries reduces the level of overall stability. In the opinion of the Iranian legislator, reliance on US defense guarantees is an ineffective strategy for ensuring the security of neighboring states. Instead of protection, the presence of extra-regional forces is viewed as a potential destabilizing factor.

As an alternative, Tehran proposes the concept of inclusive security. Iran advocates for a transition to a collective defense system that will be built by the forces of the Persian Gulf coastal states exclusively, without the direct involvement of Western countries.

### "Red lines" and sovereignty

In its statement, Iran clearly outlined its strategic priorities, which are not subject to external regulation. Such "red lines" include:

- Sovereign missile potential;
- Unmanned aerial vehicle development programs;
- Mechanisms for controlling navigation in the Strait of Hormuz.

These elements are positioned as constants of Iran's national defense doctrine.

### Geopolitical context and rhetorical goals

Statements by Iranian officials come at a time when there is an increased concentration of US Navy forces and international coalitions in the waters of the Red Sea, the Gulf of Oman, and the Persian Gulf. These forces are deployed to ensure the security of commercial shipping against the backdrop of Yemeni Houthi activity and incidents involving commercial tankers.

International relations analysts note that such rhetoric serves several important tasks. First, this is diplomatic pressure on Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Bahrain. The goal is to limit the ability of US armed forces to use their infrastructure and airspace.

Second, this strengthens Tehran's negotiating positions. By demonstrating a willingness to deploy control tools over the Strait of Hormuz — a key transport artery for global energy resources — Iran attempts to influence the course of indirect and multilateral consultations.

### Reaction of Arab countries

Despite the harsh rhetoric from Tehran, official representatives of the defense ministries of the Arab Gulf states are maintaining a course of balance. They traditionally emphasize their commitment to a diversified foreign policy. This implies a combination of maintaining strategic agreements with the US and the gradual development of bilateral communication channels with Iran to prevent conflict escalation.