--- title: "Jensen Huang: AI doesn't need new laws for control — the market and engineering are enough" description: "Jensen Huang called AI a complex technology created by humans and stated that existing laws and market mechanisms are sufficient for control, while new restrictions only slow down progress." date: 2026-09-16T11:20:00.000Z lang: en url: https://xab.info/en/posts/jensen-huang-against-ai-restrictions-market-and-engineering-enough tags: [jensen-huang, nvidia, ai-regulation, artificial-intelligence, tech-policy] publisher: "XAB.info" --- # Jensen Huang: AI doesn't need new laws for control — the market and engineering are enough ![Jensen Huang speaking at a public event about AI regulation](https://xab.info/media/2026/09/17/dzhensen-huang-protiv-ogranichenii-dlya-ii/dzhensen-huang-protiv-ogranichenii-dlya-ii-1.webp) ## 🎯 Key Points - Huang calls AI a complex technology created by humans, not an "alien mind" that needs to be feared - The head of Nvidia believes that existing laws and market mechanisms are sufficient, while new restrictions slow down progress - AI development, in his words, is an engineering task; safety and the speed of development are compatible - Critics point out that Nvidia, as the main beneficiary of the AI boom, has an interest in the absence of bureaucracy Amid a growing debate over how society should manage the development of artificial intelligence, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has taken a strong stance: AI is not an "alien mind" that humanity should fear, but a complex technology created by humans themselves. In his words, existing laws and market mechanisms are fully sufficient to keep the technology under control, and any new restrictions would only slow down progress. ### An engineering task, not a political one Huang emphasized that developing AI is first and foremost an engineering task that should be solved through technical, not political, means. In this logic, in his view, the question of whether one must choose between the speed of development and safety is framed incorrectly: both processes can and should proceed in parallel. "If we are not confident in the safety of a product, if you are creating a product or service and are not confident in its functionality, capabilities, or safety — do not release it to the market. That is a perfectly obvious decision," stated the head of the processor tech giant. ### The market as the main regulator Huang's key argument rests on the fact that businesses have no interest in releasing raw or dangerous products, since the market itself will punish a company for its mistakes. That is precisely why, in his belief, developers should independently pause and refine a product if they feel they are losing control over it. Existing legislation on product quality liability, as the head of Nvidia notes, already covers all potential risks, and no additional state bans are required. ### Open code and the international context Rejecting state bans, Huang promotes open-source models as a significant counterweight to closed laboratories, while part of the industry seeks a compromise in the form of international self-regulation. A similar idea was voiced by Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella at the All-In summit: countries such as the US and China must care equally about AI safety, since threats from cyberattacks and uncontrolled algorithms are common to the entire world. Given Huang's influence in the global industry and his dialogue with political leaders, Nvidia's position in favor of minimal state intervention could become decisive. ### Contradictory data Here it is important to honestly distinguish two points of view. On the one hand, Huang insists that neither new laws nor state bans are needed: market mechanisms and an engineering culture of safety are sufficient. On the other — critics point out that Nvidia is the main beneficiary of the "artificial intelligence boom," so it is commercially advantageous for the company to avoid any bureaucratic obstacles that could slow down the sales of its chips. The practice also supports the need for external oversight: IT giants are already facing lawsuits over damage caused by bots or social networks — as an example in the discussion, Meta's $18 billion fine is cited. Thus, we are faced not so much with a discrepancy in figures as with a fundamental disagreement over who, and with what tool, should be responsible for AI safety. ## 🔍 Fact-Check Verification - [Laws are not needed: Nvidia CEO speaks out against restrictions on artificial intelligence](https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/zakoni-potribni-ceo-nvidia-vistupiv-proti-1789551369.html) - Подтверждает основную позицию Хуанга против новых ограничений для ИИ. - [Jensen Huang stated that the AI safety problem must be solved by engineering methods, not ...](https://3dnews.ru/1148544/dgensen-huang-zayavil-chto-problemu-bezopasnosti-ii-nado-reshat-ingenernimi-metodami-a-ne-politicheskimi) - Подтверждает тезис об инженерном, а не политическом решении вопроса безопасности ИИ. - [Jensen Huang: society needs "new social norms" in the era of AI](https://3dnews.ru/1143706/dgensen-huang-obshchestvu-neobhodimi-novie-sotsialnie-normi-v-epohu-ii) - Подтверждает тезис об инженерном, а не политическом решении вопроса безопасности ИИ. - [Jensen Huang talks about the arrival of the era of electricians and plumbers](https://overclockers.ru/blog/Scorpion81/show/255397/Dzhensen-Huang-rasskazal-o-nastuplenii-epohi-elektrikov-i-santehnikov) - Подтверждено по источнику overclockers.ru ## ❓ FAQ ### Q: Does Jensen Huang believe that AI needs new laws? **A:** No. He believes that existing legislation and market mechanisms are sufficient for control, while new restrictions would only slow down progress. ### Q: How does Huang describe the nature of artificial intelligence? **A:** As a complex technology created by humans themselves, not as an "alien mind" that humanity should fear. ### Q: What do critics of Nvidia's position say? **A:** They point out that the company is the main beneficiary of the "artificial intelligence boom," so it is commercially advantageous for it to avoid bureaucratic obstacles to chip sales.