---
title: "In Kyiv, a Territorial Recruitment Center illegally detained a doctor — father of five: exemption 'vanished' from the database, prosecution opened a criminal case"
description: "In Kyiv, a TRC illegally detained a doctor — father of five — who had an exemption. The exemption record 'vanished' from the database in front of the inspectors. The prosecution opened a criminal case."
date: 2026-09-03T15:16:00.000Z
lang: en
url: https://xab.info/en/posts/kyiv-trc-illegally-detained-doctor-father-of-five-exemption-vanished
tags: [ukraine, tcc, mobilization, ombudsman, human-rights, kyiv, deferment, criminal-investigation]
publisher: "XAB.info"
---

# In Kyiv, a Territorial Recruitment Center illegally detained a doctor — father of five: exemption 'vanished' from the database, prosecution opened a criminal case

![Document check at the TCC: a uniformed officer holding a folder and pen, with a group of people in military dress in the background — story about the unlawful detention of a doctor and father of five in Kyiv](https://xab.info/media/2026/09/03/kyiv-tck-nezakonno-uderzhal-otca-pyaterokh-detey-otsrochka-ischezla/kyiv-tck-nezakonno-uderzhal-otca-pyaterokh-detey-otsrochka-ischezla-1.webp)

## 🎯 Key Points

- In June 2026, in Kyiv, a TRC illegally detained and held a doctor — father of five — who had a lawful exemption
- The exemption record was missing from the TRC database, although it was confirmed in 'Diia' and 'Reserve+'; the Ombudsman demanded an answer from the investigation
- In August 2026, the prosecution opened a criminal case following the incident
- The incident is part of a series of documented violations of citizens' rights by TRCs in different regions of Ukraine

In Kyiv, staff of a Territorial Recruitment Center (TRC) illegally detained and held in the premises of a military registration office a man who had a lawful exemption from mobilization. The victim — a doctor raising five minor children — was forcibly brought to the center, his mobile phone was confiscated, and, according to the Ombudsman of the Verkhovna Rada for Human Rights, Dmytro Lubinets, the record of his exemption in the TRC's database 'vanished' right in front of the inspectors. Following the incident, identified in June 2026, the prosecution opened a criminal case in August.

### How the detention took place

According to a statement by the Ombudsman's Office, the incident occurred in the morning: the man was detained right at the entrance to his building. He immediately presented his military registration documents and showed the birth certificates of all five of his children in the state 'Diia' app. Nevertheless, no detention protocol was drawn up, the citizen's mobile phone was confiscated, and he was forcibly taken to the mobilization center to undergo a military medical commission. After the medical commission, the man was not released but continued to be held in the TRC's premises. The situation was only stopped after the intervention of representatives of the Ombudsman's Office, who secured the return of the phone and the immediate release of the detained man.

### Exemption 'vanished' from the database

The key episode that drew the Ombudsman's attention is related to the verification of the exemption status. In the presence of Ombudsman Lubinets's Office staff, the detained man showed the children's birth certificates in 'Diia' and a saved screenshot from the 'Reserve+' app confirming the existence of a lawful exemption. However, upon re-checking the information directly in the TRC's information database, the record of the exemption was missing. 'How did it disappear? Who and under what circumstances altered this information? The investigation must answer these questions,' Dmytro Lubinets emphasized. The Ombudsman also stated that citizens who have lawful grounds for an exemption are not required to prove their rights after having been illegally detained and brought to the TRC.

### Contradictory data

The editorial team does not have an official comment from the specific TRC where the incident occurred, nor any clarification from the Ministry of Defense or the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on how exactly the exemption record could have been deleted or 'lost' in the database. On the one hand, the Ombudsman's Office records the fact: at the time of the check in June 2026, the record was absent, although it was present in 'Diia' and 'Reserve+'. On the other hand, until the pre-trial investigation is completed, it is impossible to establish whether this was a technical failure, an unauthorized alteration of the data by a specific employee, or some other cause. Moreover, about two months passed between the date of the incident (June 2026) and the opening of the criminal case (August 2026) — this time gap has also not been publicly explained by either side. Thus, both versions — 'intentional deletion of the record' and 'system failure' — remain within the scope of the investigation until its completion.

### Criminal case and the course of the investigation

In August 2026, law enforcement agencies began a pre-trial investigation into this case. Investigators are establishing all the circumstances of the incident, identifying the circle of persons involved, and providing a legal assessment of the actions of the TRC staff. The specific articles of the Criminal Code under which the act was qualified were not disclosed at the time of publication. The Ombudsman's Office, which initiated the check, continues to monitor the situation.

### Systemic context: not an isolated case

The incident in Kyiv is not isolated. Recently, Dmytro Lubinets reported that in another case a TRC mobilized a man whose wife had died and who was left alone with two minor children. RBC-Ukraine also documented a series of violations in Cherkasy Oblast, where a citizen with a lawful exemption was detained and taken about 140 km from his home. These episodes point to a recurring pattern: TRC staff at the local level apply measures that do not comply with the current legislation on exemptions, while the mechanisms for rapid response and protection of citizens' rights remain insufficiently effective.

## 🔍 Fact-Check Verification

- [Exemption vanished from 'Reserve+': in Kyiv a TRC illegally detained the father of five](https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/znikla-vidstrochka-rezerv-kievi-ttsk-nezakonno-1788447927.html) - Первичный источник. Подтверждает дату инцидента (июнь 2026), обстоятельства задержания, вмешательство Офиса омбудсmana, факт «исчезновения» записи об отсрочке в базе ТЦК и открытие уголовного производства в августе 2026. Ссылка на заявление Д. Лубинца.
- [There is an exemption, but the TRC is searching for you: how to be removed from the list and whether a fine must be paid](https://www.unian.net/society/ye-vidstrochka-ale-v-rozshuku-yak-znyatisya-i-chi-treba-platiti-shtraf-13428147.html) - Контекстный источник. Описывает механизмы работы отсрочек и взаимодействия с ТЦК, что согласуется с описанной в основной новости процедурой проверки статуса.
- [Exemption from mobilization will not be restored automatically: when you need to report to the TRC](https://focus.ua/eksklyuzivy/688861-otsrochka-ot-mobilizacii-kak-ee-vozobnovit-novosti-ukrainy) - Контекстный источник. Подтверждает, что отсрочка требует актуализации и не возобновляется автоматически, что может быть связано с вопросами о «пропаже» записи в базе.
- [How to obtain an exemption if the father has a disability: a lawyer gave advice](https://www.unian.net/society/kak-poluchit-otsrochku-po-uhodu-za-otcom-invalidom-advokat-razlozhila-vse-po-polochkam-12979638.html) - Контекстный источник. Описывает механизмы работы отсрочек и взаимодействия с ТЦК, что согласуется с описанной в основной новости процедурой проверки статуса.

## ❓ FAQ

### Q: What happened to the father of five at the Kyiv TRC?
**A:** In June 2026, a male doctor with a lawful exemption was detained at the entrance to his building without a protocol being drawn up, his phone was confiscated, and he was forcibly taken to the TRC for a military medical commission. After the commission, he was not released. The intervention of the Ombudsman's Office led to the return of the phone and his release.

### Q: Why does the Ombudsman consider the situation illegal?
**A:** Dmytro Lubinets pointed out that the detention was carried out without a protocol, the phone was confiscated without legal grounds, and a citizen with a confirmed exemption should not have to prove his rights after an illegal detention. Moreover, the exemption record was missing from the TRC database, although it was confirmed in 'Diia' and 'Reserve+'.

### Q: What measures were taken regarding this incident?
**A:** In August 2026, the prosecution opened a criminal case. Investigators are establishing the circumstances of the incident, the persons involved, and providing a legal assessment of the actions of the TRC staff. The specific Criminal Code articles were not disclosed at the time of publication.

### Q: Is this case isolated?
**A:** No. The Ombudsman's Office and RBC-Ukraine document a series of similar violations: in one case a TRC mobilized a widower with two children, and in Cherkasy Oblast a man with an exemption was taken 140 km from his home. This indicates the systemic nature of the problems.