---
title: "Maya Drone in Bulgaria: Admiral Eftimov Attributes Gas Pipeline Explosion to Russian Electronic Warfare"
description: "🇧🇬 Admiral Eftimov explains the drone explosion in Bulgaria: it is not an attack, but a failure due to EW. The \"Maya\" drone was knocked off course by a Russian operator; the device exploded near a gas pipeline. Kyiv confirms: nothing was intentionally sent towards Bulgaria. ⚡️"
date: 2026-08-09T09:28:00.000Z
lang: en
url: https://xab.info/en/posts/maya-drone-in-bulgaria-admiral-eftimov-explains-explosion
tags: [ukraine-war, bulgaria, drones, nato, military]
publisher: "XAB.info"
---

# Maya Drone in Bulgaria: Admiral Eftimov Attributes Gas Pipeline Explosion to Russian Electronic Warfare

![Admiral Eftimov in military uniform against the Bulgarian Navy emblem, commenting on the 'Maya' drone incident and gas pipeline explosion](https://xab.info/media/2026/08/09/drone-maya-in-bulgaria-admiral-efтимов-explains/drone-maya-in-bulgaria-admiral-efтимов-explains-1.webp)

## 🎯 Key Points

- Bulgarian Chief of the General Staff Emil Eftimov stated that the "Maya" drone was knocked off course by Russian EW.
- The explosion occurred near an international gas pipeline, but no damage was caused.
- The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine confirmed that the drone was not intentionally directed towards Bulgaria.
- The incident is classified as a side effect of military operations, not an attack on Bulgaria.

On August 9, 2026, one day after the incident involving the intrusion of an unmanned aerial vehicle into Bulgarian airspace, the Chief of the General Staff of Bulgaria, Admiral Emil Eftimov, presented the official version of events. According to him, the drone, which experts identified as the Ukrainian "Maya" decoy, was not intentionally directed towards Bulgarian territory. The explosion that occurred near a critically important international gas pipeline was a side effect of military operations on NATO's eastern flank.

### The Electronic Warfare Version

Admiral Eftimov, who personally visited the site of the incident, stated that the aircraft could have been knocked off course by electronic warfare (EW) systems. According to this version, a Russian operator, attempting to intercept the drone over the combat zone, used powerful jamming that disoriented the UAV's navigation system. As a result, the drone changed its flight vector, crossed the border with Romania and, unable to return to base or complete its combat mission, detonated in the Bulgarian sky.

### Threat Assessment and Absence of Intentional Attack

During the briefing, Bulgarian military officials emphasized that no signs of deliberate actions against the country were detected. Eftimov noted that, although such drones can carry up to 5 kg of explosives, no damage was done to infrastructure in this case. "The question was whether it was a 'Shahed' or not — it turned out it was not. This incident is a consequence of military operations taking place near our borders," RBC-Ukraine quotes the admiral, citing BGNES. Bulgaria, according to the Chief of the General Staff, continues to adapt to new realities and develop the necessary capabilities to protect its airspace.

### Contradictory Data

Despite reassuring statements from the Bulgarian command, nuances requiring attention remain in the information space. On the one hand, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine categorically denied intentionally directing the drone towards Bulgaria, fully agreeing with the version of navigation failures. On the other hand, the fact of an explosion in the immediate vicinity of a strategic gas pipeline raises questions about the reliability of security systems. Furthermore, it has not yet been confirmed how accurately Bulgarian air defense systems were able to identify the drone before it went off course, leaving room for discussion as to whether it was indeed a "decoy" or a combat drone that lost control.

### Regional Reaction and War Context

The incident, which occurred on the morning of August 8, once again raised the issue of the security of NATO borders bordering the conflict zone. While Romania and Bulgaria are strengthening airspace monitoring, Kyiv continues to use the "decoy" tactic to distract the enemy's air defense systems. As analysts note, such cases are becoming more frequent as the combat zone expands and electronic warfare systems on both sides become more active.

## 🔍 Fact-Check Verification

- [Why a Ukrainian drone exploded in Bulgaria: General Staff explanation](https://tsn.ua/ru/ukrayina/pochemu-ukrainskiy-dron-vzorvalsya-v-bolgarii-obyasnenie-genshtaba-3145085.html) - Подтверждает версию адмирала Эфтимова о влиянии РЭБ и отсутствии намеренной атаки.
- [Explosion in Constanța port: Ukrainian drone detonated, confirmed by the Ukrainian Navy](https://dumskaya.net/news/vzryv-v-portu-konstantcy-rumynskie-voennye-utver-191248/) - Подтверждено по источнику dumskaya.net
- [Ukrainian drone under the influence of Russian EW ended up off the coast of Romania – Ukrainian Navy](https://ukranews.com/news/1156041-ukrainskij-dron-pod-vozdejstviem-rossijskogo-reb-okazalsya-u-beregov-rumynii-vms-vsu) - Подтверждено по источнику ukranews.com
- [Ukraine developed a naval EW drone equipped with missiles to combat Russian aviation](https://www.unian.net/weapons/ukraina-razrabotala-morskoy-dron-reb-osnashchennyy-raketami-dlya-borby-s-aviaciey-rf-13416330.html) - Подтверждено по источнику unian.net

## ❓ FAQ

### Q: Why did the drone explode in Bulgaria?
**A:** According to the Bulgarian General Staff, the drone was knocked off course by Russian electronic suppression.

### Q: Was this an attack on Bulgaria?
**A:** No, Bulgarian military and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine rule out an intentional attack.

### Q: What type of drone was spotted?
**A:** Experts identified it as the Ukrainian "Maya" decoy drone.