--- title: "Smiliansky Files Lawsuit Against NBU: Ukrposhta CEO Demands Reversal of Dismissal and Vows to 'Destroy the Reputation' of Pyshnyi" description: "Ukrposhta CEO Smiliansky has filed a lawsuit against the NBU, demanding the reversal of his dismissal. He accused the regulator of bias and vowed to \"destroy the reputation\" of NBU head Pyshnyi." date: 2026-09-16T11:08:00.000Z lang: en url: https://xab.info/en/posts/smiliansky-files-lawsuit-against-nbu-ukrposhta tags: [ukrposhta, national-bank-ukraine, igor-smiliansky, lawsuit, n, administrative-court] publisher: "XAB.info" --- # Smiliansky Files Lawsuit Against NBU: Ukrposhta CEO Demands Reversal of Dismissal and Vows to 'Destroy the Reputation' of Pyshnyi ![Volodymyr Smyliansky, CEO of Ukrposhta, who filed a lawsuit against the NBU demanding his dismissal be overturned](https://xab.info/media/2026/09/17/smiliansky-podal-isk-protiv-nbu-ukrposhta/smiliansky-podal-isk-protiv-nbu-ukrposhta-1.webp) ## 🎯 Key Points - Ihor Smiliansky filed a lawsuit with the Kyiv District Administrative Court, demanding the annulment of the NBU's decision on his professional unfitness - In November 2025, the NBU unanimously, through two collegiate bodies, deemed Smiliansky professionally unfit - Smiliansky accused the regulator of bias and vowed to "destroy the reputation" of NBU head Pyshnyi - Ukrposhta caused more than 400 million hryvnias in operational damage in 2025, which became the basis for the NBU's decision - Smiliansky continued to perform the duties of CEO, ignoring the NBU's demand to suspend him Ihor Smiliansky, the CEO of Ukrposhta JSC, has officially filed a lawsuit with the Kyiv District Administrative Court against the National Bank of Ukraine. The head of the state postal monopoly is demanding the annulment of the regulator's decision, under which he was deemed professionally unfit to perform the duties of a chief executive. Smiliansky himself announced this in a Facebook post on September 16, 2026, as reported by RBC-Ukraine, Delo, Slovo i Dilo, and Telegraf. ### Smiliansky's Position: "The Decision Is Illegal and Biased" In his statement, Smiliansky insists that the NBU's decision is "illegal and biased." According to him, the approach applied to the head of Ukrposhta was not used against the heads of other operating banks and financial institutions β€” even after those institutions received fines many times exceeding the sanctions imposed on Ukrposhta, and even in cases of violations proven by the NBU itself. "I am confident in my position and ready to prove it in court," the CEO stated, adding that he filed the lawsuit personally and is paying for legal services out of his own funds. ### Vow to "Destroy the Reputation" of Pyshnyi Particular resonance was triggered by Smiliansky's remark that the NBU "attempted to destroy his professional reputation" by deeming him professionally unfit. In response, he declared: "Now it is my turn to destroy the remnants of Mr. Pyshnyi's reputation through the courts." Thus, the conflict between the head of Ukrposhta and the head of the NBU has gone beyond the bounds of a formal administrative dispute and acquired a distinctly personal character. ### The National Bank's Version The NBU itself had previously explained that the decision on Smiliansky's professional unfitness was adopted unanimously by two collegiate bodies of the regulator back in November 2025. According to the bank, Ukrposhta caused more than 400 million hryvnias in operational damage in 2025. It was precisely this fact, the regulator claims, that served as the basis for the conclusion that the chief executive was unable to ensure proper management of the enterprise. ### Context: A Suspension That Never Happened It is worth noting that even before filing the lawsuit, Smiliansky continued to perform the duties of CEO of Ukrposhta in full, despite the NBU's demand to suspend him from his leadership role. In effect, the regulator and the enterprise under its supervision had been in a state of open institutional conflict for several months before the dispute was taken to the courts. ### Contradictory Data There are a number of significant discrepancies between the positions of the two sides. Smiliansky claims that the NBU's decision is exceptional and has no precedent in the regulator's practice, whereas the NBU emphasizes the unanimity of the two collegiate bodies and cites specific financial losses. In addition, in the initial media reports the CEO's name was recorded in two variants β€” "Smiliansky" and "Smelyansky" β€” which creates additional confusion in the public sphere. The question of whether similar measures were truly not applied to other heads of financial institutions remains a matter for the court proceedings and cannot be definitively confirmed or refuted at the current stage. ### What Happens Next The Kyiv District Administrative Court must now consider the lawsuit and determine whether the NBU's decision to deem Smiliansky professionally unfit was lawful and justified. The outcome of the case could set a precedent for the regulator's practice of applying the "professional unfitness" mechanism to the heads of supervised enterprises. For Ukrposhta, the court's ruling will determine who will in fact manage the state postal operator in the coming months. ## πŸ” Fact-Check Verification - [Smelyansky Sues the NBU and Accuses Pyshnyi of Personal Revenge](https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/smilyanskiy-suditsya-nbu-ta-zvinuvativ-pishnogo-1789556485.html) - ΠŸΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ иска, Ρ†ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ Бмилянского, ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡŽ НБУ ΠΎ 400 ΠΌΠ»Π½ Π³Ρ€Π½ ΡƒΡ‰Π΅Ρ€Π±Π° ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅ΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ноября 2025 Π³. - [Ukrposhta CEO Smiliansky Files Lawsuit Against the NBU: What He Is Demanding](https://delo.ua/ru/news/gendirektor-ukrpocty-smilyanskii-podal-isk-protiv-nbu-cto-trebuet-472571/) - ΠŸΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‡Ρƒ иска Π² КиСвский ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ административный суд ΠΈ трСбования ΠΎΠ± ΠΎΡ‚ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅ ΡƒΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. - [Smiliansky Files Lawsuit Against the NBU to Reverse His Dismissal from Ukrposhta](https://ru.slovoidilo.ua/2026/09/16/novost/politika/smilyanskij-podal-isk-nbu-chtoby-otmenit-uvolnenie-ukrpochty) - ΠŸΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ Π΄Π°Ρ‚Ρƒ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ (16.09.2026), суд ΠΈ ΡΡƒΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. - [Smiliansky Sues the NBU and Vows to "Destroy the Remnants of the Reputation" of Pyshnyi](https://news.telegraf.com.ua/ukraina/5950096-smilyanskiy-podav-do-sudu-na-nbu-ta-poobitsyav-znishchiti-zalishki-reputatsii-pishnogo) - ΠŸΠΎΠ΄Ρ‚Π²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅Ρ‚ Ρ†ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρƒ ΠΎΠ± Β«ΡƒΠ½ΠΈΡ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ€Π΅ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈΒ» ΠŸΡ‹ΡˆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Ρ…Π°Ρ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ„Π»ΠΈΠΊΡ‚Π°. ## ❓ FAQ ### Q: What exactly is Smiliansky asking the court to do? **A:** Ihor Smiliansky is demanding the annulment of the NBU's decision deeming him professionally unfit to perform the duties of CEO of Ukrposhta, which effectively amounts to his dismissal. ### Q: When and by whom was the NBU's decision made? **A:** According to the National Bank, the decision on Smiliansky's professional unfitness was adopted unanimously by two collegiate bodies of the regulator in November 2025. ### Q: What financial losses of Ukrposhta does the NBU cite? **A:** The NBU reports that Ukrposhta caused more than 400 million hryvnias in operational damage in 2025. It is precisely this fact that the regulator cites as the basis for the conclusion about the chief executive's inability to manage. ### Q: Is Smiliansky still working as CEO? **A:** Yes. Despite the NBU's demand to suspend him from his leadership role, Smiliansky continued to perform the duties of CEO of Ukrposhta in full until the moment the lawsuit was filed. ### Q: Who is paying for Smiliansky's legal services? **A:** Smiliansky stated that he filed the lawsuit personally and is paying for his lawyers' services out of his own funds, not from Ukrposhta's funds.