--- title: "Tech War: US Demands Allies Choose Between Pax Silica and Chinese Coalition" description: "🇺🇸 US demands 35 countries renounce cooperation with China in AI and semiconductors. 🇨🇳 Beijing created its own organization in Shanghai. 🇰🇿 Kazakhstan is in the spotlight due to its dual position. #technology #geopolitics #AI" date: 2026-08-16T20:44:30.000Z lang: en url: https://xab.info/en/posts/tech-war-us-demands-allies-choose-pax-silica-china-2026 tags: [usa-china-tech-war, artificial-intelligence, semiconductors, pax-silica, kazakhstan-geopolitics] publisher: "XAB.info" --- # Tech War: US Demands Allies Choose Between Pax Silica and Chinese Coalition ![Symbolic depiction of a building with columns representing Pax Silica and US technological sovereignty](https://xab.info/media/2026/08/16/usa-china-tech-war-ai-coalitions-2026/usa-china-tech-war-ai-coalitions-2026-1.webp) ## 🎯 Key Points - The US demands allies renounce participation in Chinese technological initiatives. - China established the World Organization for AI Cooperation in Shanghai. - Kazakhstan is in the spotlight due to its participation in both coalitions. - Technological confrontation leads to the polarization of the global market. In August 2026, the geopolitical confrontation in the high-tech sector reached a new phase. The US administration, seeking to maintain its technological dominance, launched an unprecedented campaign to consolidate allies against China. The central element of this strategy was the demand for partner states to withdraw from initiatives promoted by Beijing in the fields of artificial intelligence (AI), semiconductors, and critical minerals. ### Diplomatic Pressure and the Letter to 35 Countries According to sources cited by Reuters, the White House is preparing to send an official letter to representatives of 35 countries. The document is based on the "Statement on AI Opportunities," signed back in June. The essence of the proposal is for recipient countries to commit to not participating in projects initiated by the PRC. This effectively amounts to a demand to choose: either cooperation with the US within its technological bloc, or isolation from Western markets. The document pays special attention to countries that have already joined the Pax Silica alliance, created last year to ensure the stability of supply chains for chips and rare earth metals. Washington insists that "sitting on two stools" in the context of a technological war is impossible, and participation in competing structures is unacceptable. ### Beijing's Countermove and Organization in Shanghai China is not standing aside from the escalation. In July 2026, Xi Jinping founded the World Organization for AI Cooperation, headquartered in Shanghai. According to data, this structure is intended to promote Chinese open-weight AI models on the global market, offering an alternative to Western solutions. However, despite the rhetoric about openness, analysts note that access for foreigners to advanced Chinese technologies remains strictly regulated. The Chinese Embassy in the US has already reacted to Washington's actions, condemning the politicization of the technological sphere and calling such practices destructive to world trade. Beijing emphasizes that technological progress should not be an instrument of geopolitical pressure. ### Contradictory Data There is a significant gap between the official rhetoric and the actual actions of both sides. On the one hand, the US demands that allies renounce Chinese initiatives, citing the need to protect national security. On the other hand, China declares the creation of an open platform for cooperation, while in practice restricting access to its technologies. Furthermore, data on which specific countries have already received the letter from the US and how they reacted remains fragmented and unconfirmed officially. ### Kazakhstan in the Spotlight Kazakhstan is of particular interest to the US, possessing significant reserves of rare earth minerals critical for the production of semiconductors and the defense industry. The country is already a participant in both Pax Silica and the Chinese AI organization, which irritates American officials. Washington views Kazakhstan as a potential alternative to Chinese supplies, but its dual position creates risks for long-term relations with the US. ### Consequences for the Global Market The escalation of the technological confrontation leads to further polarization of the global market. The formation of two competing blocs — under the aegis of the US and China — could lead to the fragmentation of supply chains, rising component prices, and a slowdown in innovation. Countries caught in the middle of this confrontation are forced to make a difficult choice that could affect their economic development and geopolitical status. ## 🔍 Fact-Check Verification - ["Symphony of International Cooperation": China creates organization in Shanghai to regulate...](https://www.rfi.fr/ru/%D0%B2-%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B5/20260717-%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BC%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B6%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE-%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0-%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%B9-%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%B2-%D1%88%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%B5-%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8E-%D0%BF%D0%BE-%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B3%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8E-%D0%B8%D0%B8-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%B7-%D0%B5%D1%81-%D0%B8-%D1%81%D1%88%D0%B0) - Подтверждает создание китайской организации по ИИ в июле 2026 года. ## ❓ FAQ ### Q: What is Pax Silica? **A:** Pax Silica is an alliance created by the US last year to ensure stable supply chains in the fields of AI, semiconductors, and critical minerals. ### Q: Why is Kazakhstan of interest to the US? **A:** Kazakhstan possesses significant reserves of rare earth minerals that are important for the production of semiconductors and the defense industry. ### Q: What is China's reaction to US actions? **A:** China has condemned the politicization of the technological sphere and called such practices destructive.