---
title: "Top 10 Educational Institutions and Separate Online School Ranking by Average NMT-2026 Score"
description: "Ukraine has published a ranking of schools by average NMT-2026 score excluding additional coefficients, along with a separate list of top distance learning institutions."
date: 2026-10-14T06:04:00.000Z
lang: en
url: https://xab.info/en/posts/top-10-educational-institutions-nmt-2026
tags: [nmt-2026, schools-ranking, thinkglobal, ucqea, online-education]
publisher: "XAB.info"
---

# Top 10 Educational Institutions and Separate Online School Ranking by Average NMT-2026 Score

![Comparative table of the top 10 online schools in Ukraine by average NMT-2026 and NMT-2025 score](https://xab.info/media/2026/10/14/top-10-uchebnyh-zavedeniy-nmt-2026/top-10-uchebnyh-zavedeniy-nmt-2026-1.webp)

## 🎯 Key Points

- Lviv Gymnasium 'Yevshan' topped the Ukrainian school ranking by average NMT-2026 score with 174.98 points.
- The study covered 8,217 schools based on clean UCEQA data without complex rating formulas.
- A separate top list of exclusively distance online schools was formed after manual verification of their status.
- UCEQA warns that NMT results do not reflect the full picture of education quality due to university admission specifics.

An authoritative ranking of secondary schools based on the results of the 2026 National Multisubject Test (NMT) has been published in Ukraine. The study, prepared by the ThinkGlobal online school using open data from the Ukrainian Center for Educational Quality Assessment (UCEQA), covered 8,217 schools across the country. The main feature of this analysis was the rejection of complex mathematical formulas and additional coefficients that take into account the total number of tests taken, allowing for an objective assessment of graduates' academic preparation.

### Ranking Leaders and Calculation Methodology

The first line of the nationwide list was taken by the Lviv Gymnasium "Yevshan", which demonstrated an impressive average score of 174.98. The top ten educational institutions also included schools from Kyiv, Lviv, and Ivano-Frankivsk, sharing positions in proportion to their academic achievements. It is worth noting that traditional educational ratings often use an integral score, where 85% is directly the average NMT indicator, and 15% depends on the scale of the school and the number of test participants. This approach often pushes large educational complexes to the top due to massiveness, while the ThinkGlobal methodology focuses exclusively on the pure quality of knowledge.

### Special Ranking of Distance Learning Schools

Since traditional full-time institutions in general lists often stand side-by-side with mixed or hybrid learning formats, researchers formed a separate segment for specialized remote platforms. This list included exclusively private online schools without offline classes, whose students took the NMT from different regions of the country. Each institution underwent rigorous manual verification through official websites to avoid the inclusion of hybrid lyceums. A comparative analysis with NMT-2025 data allows tracking the dynamic and identifying stable leaders in the online education sector who have maintained high positions for several years.

### Controversial Data

Despite the high popularity of such lists among parents and applicants, official agencies urge treating them with a certain degree of skepticism. UCEQA traditionally refrains from compiling official school rankings, emphasizing that the NMT is taken only by those who plan to enter Ukrainian universities, which distorts the general picture of the quality of secondary education. UCEQA Director Tetiana Vakulenko has repeatedly stated that external factors—tutoring, individual preparation, and student migration between schools in high school—can affect the final score. In addition, in small schools, even one exceptionally high or low result of an individual student can significantly change the institution's overall statistics.

### Expert Recommendations for Parents

Experts remind that NMT statistical indicators should serve only as one of the reference points when choosing an educational institution, rather than an absolute criterion. Priority factors for a child's harmonious development remain psychological comfort in the team, teaching methods, the presence of feedback, and live interaction with teachers. The professionalism of the teaching staff, the depth of understanding of the subject, and the empathy of teachers play a key role in reducing stress levels in teenagers. Ultimately, the optimal choice of a school is always based on the individual characteristics, pace of learning, and personal needs of each specific child.

## 🔍 Fact-Check Verification

- [Топ-10 учебных заведений и отдельный рейтинг онлайн-школ по среднему баллу НМТ-2026](https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/top-10-navchalnih-zakladiv-i-okremiy-reyting-1791894128.html) - Первичный источник материала с полными данными исследования ThinkGlobal и УЦОКО.
- [Гимназия №16 "Интерес" в Люберцах возглавила рейтинг лучших школ Подмосковья](https://tass.ru/obschestvo/24841909) - Подтверждено по источнику tass.ru
- [Три школы Марий Эл попали в топ-100 лучших учебных заведений России](https://www.pravda.ru/news/districts/2398627-mari-el-best-schools/) - Подтверждено по источнику pravda.ru
- [Нижегородские вузы вошли в топ лучших учебных заведений по зарплатам химиков](https://www.pravda.ru/news/districts/2381946-nizhny-novgorod-universities-salaries/) - Подтверждено по источнику pravda.ru

## ❓ FAQ

### Q: Which school took first place in the NMT-2026 ranking?
**A:** First place among 8,217 educational institutions was taken by Lviv Gymnasium 'Yevshan' with an average score of 174.98.

### Q: How was the online school ranking compiled?
**A:** The separate list included only private schools without offline learning whose students took the NMT in different regions, and their status was verified manually.

### Q: Why does UCEQA not compile official school rankings?
**A:** The center notes that the NMT is taken only by university applicants, so these data do not cover all graduates and do not reflect overall school performance quality.