---
title: "Zelenskyy in PBS Interview: 'Better to Pressure Putin, Not Me – I Am Not the Aggressor'"
description: "In an interview with PBS NewsHour, Zelenskyy urged Washington to increase pressure on Putin rather than Kyiv, questioned the effectiveness of the U.S. deal on Russian diesel, and stated that a strong Ukraine is in the pragmatic interest of the United States itself."
date: 2026-11-03T11:06:41.113Z
lang: en
url: https://xab.info/en/posts/zelenskyy-interview-pbs-pressure-putin
tags: [ukraine, usa, zelensky, trump, putin, pbs-news-hour, russian-diesel-deal, nato, sanctions]
author: "Andrey Kosynko"
publisher: "XAB.info"
---

# Zelenskyy in PBS Interview: 'Better to Pressure Putin, Not Me – I Am Not the Aggressor'

![Volodymyr Zelenskyy in front of Ukrainian and U.S. flags during a PBS NewsHour interview](https://xab.info/media/2026/11/03/zelensky-interview-pbs-pressure-putin/zelensky-interview-pbs-pressure-putin-1.webp)

## Key Points

- Zelenskyy in an interview with PBS NewsHour urged the U.S. to redirect pressure from Ukraine to Russia: 'I am not the aggressor'
- The Ukrainian President questioned whether the U.S. deal to buy Russian diesel fuel would affect prices on the American market
- Zelenskyy argued that a strong Ukraine protects not only itself but also Europe and the pragmatic interests of the U.S.
- The interview occurred against the backdrop of suspended U.S. intelligence transfers and Starlink restrictions, which Zelenskyy previously addressed on NBC

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in an interview with the PBS NewsHour program, provided an extensive assessment of the current relations between Kyiv and Washington, which he described as remaining "difficult." Standing against the backdrop of Ukrainian and U.S. flags, the head of state urged the American administration to redirect the vector of pressure: instead of demanding concessions from Kyiv, Washington should increase sanctions and political pressure on Moscow, which he asserts is the aggressor side in the ongoing conflict. The interview became one of the most candid public statements by Zelenskyy regarding the state of bilateral relations, against a backdrop of a series of controversial decisions by the American administration in recent months.

### Pragmatism Instead of Emotion: How Zelenskyy Described Relations with Trump

The PBS NewsHour journalist asked the Ukrainian president to briefly characterize his current relationship with the American leader. Zelenskyy replied that in wartime, a pragmatic approach is key: parties must move away from emotional assessments and rely on concrete interests. At the same time, he emphasized that in any dialogue, one cannot forget who started the invasion, and that responsibility for the aggression lies with the Russian leader Vladimir Putin, whom Zelenskyy called a "dictator." Such wording in a public interview with an American television channel became one of the sharpest public statements by the Ukrainian president toward the Russian leadership in recent times.

### 'Not Me, but Putin': A Call to Change the Direction of Pressure

Concluding his position, Zelenskyy addressed the U.S. administration with a direct appeal to change the direction of diplomatic and economic pressure. "It is better to pressure Putin, not me. Not me. I am not the aggressor," he declared. According to him, it was Russia that started the war, so responsibility for its continuation should not be shifted to Ukraine. This statement resonates with earlier remarks by Zelenskyy in an interview with NBC Meet the Press, where he also expressed hope that Trump would reconsider a number of recent decisions and change his approach to Putin, emphasizing that Kyiv still wants to trust the United States and expects the preservation of allied relations.

### Skepticism Regarding the Russian Diesel Fuel Deal

Separately, the head of state commented on U.S. agreements regarding the purchase of Russian diesel fuel. Zelenskyy doubted that such an agreement would have the promised impact on prices in the American fuel market. In the context of broader criticism expressed in the NBC interview, the Ukrainian president pointed out that the aggregate of Washington's decisions—from the temporary cessation of some intelligence data transfers to restrictions on Starlink and Starshield satellite communications and the easing of sanctions pressure—creates the impression in Moscow that it is receiving political and economic concessions without stopping hostilities. The diesel fuel deal, in his view, fits into this logic and does not carry any real economic effect for consumers in the U.S.

### 'We Are Defending Europe, Not Just Ourselves': The Argument About U.S. Pragmatic Interests

Zelenskyy also emphasized that supporting Ukraine serves the pragmatic interests of the United States itself. According to him, the Ukrainian army must remain strong, because otherwise Russia could continue its advance into Europe and approach the borders of NATO countries. "If we are talking about pragmatic things, we must support Ukraine because it must be strong. Otherwise, Putin will go further into Europe and into different parts of NATO countries. And in these cases, America will have to decide different things, it is very dangerous. It is better to make Ukraine stronger because we are defending Europe, not just ourselves," the president stated. This argument became central to his appeal to the American audience: Kyiv, according to his logic, acts as a buffer, whose weakening ultimately creates additional risks and expenses for Washington.

### Context: Intelligence, Starlink, and the Energy Truce

The PBS interview did not occur in a vacuum. As reported by DW, on October 13, 2026, Zelenskyy stated that before the strike of five ballistic missiles on Kyiv's infrastructure on October 12, partners did not provide Ukraine with a warning and intelligence data. "Intelligence data on the launch of Russian ballistic missiles helps to save people's lives, and this is one of the most critical issues," he wrote on Telegram. At the same time, Ukrainian forces did not strike Russian oil refineries for two days after Trump announced a ceasefire in the energy sector, whereas the Russian Armed Forces, according to Zelenskyy, continued to attack Ukrainian energy facilities. These circumstances form the background against which the statements on PBS NewsHour sound like an attempt to publicly register the discrepancy between Kyiv's expectations and Washington's actual actions.

## Fact-Check & Sources

- [Зеленский откровенно высказался об отношениях с Трампом и призвал его давить на Путина](https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/zelenskiy-vidverto-vislovivsya-vidnosini-1793703701.html) - Primary source: full text of Zelenskyy's quotes from the PBS NewsHour interview, including direct speech on pressure on Putin, the diesel deal, and U.S. pragmatic interests.
- ["Мы не сможем устоять": Зеленский откровенно рассказал о скандале с Трампом](https://glavred.info/politics/my-ne-smozhem-ustoyat-zelenskiy-otkrovenno-rasskazal-o-skandale-s-trampom-10805219.html) - Confirms context: hope for a revision of Trump's decisions, issues of intelligence data, Starlink/Starshield, sanctions, and the diesel deal; NBC Meet the Press interview.
- [Зеленский: Киев не получил разведданные от партнеров о ракете РФ](https://www.dw.com/ru/zelenskij-kiev-ne-polucil-razveddannye-ot-partnerov-o-rakete-rf/a-79649266) - Dates to 10/13/2026; confirms the lack of warning about five ballistic missiles on October 12 and Ukraine's 48-hour moratorium on strikes against refineries after Trump's announcement.
- [Зеленский унизил Трампа, ответ раздавит ВСУ: главная новость СВО 17 октября](https://aif.ru/politics/zelenskiy-unizil-trampa-otvet-razdavit-vsu-glavnaya-novost-svo-18-oktyabrya) - Editorial framing of the Russian publication; contains no factual contradictions with the source, used only as an indicator of Russian reaction.

## FAQ

### Where and when were Zelenskyy's statements made?

The statements were made in an interview with the PBS NewsHour program. The exact date of the broadcast is not specified in the provided materials, but the context (references to events on October 12–13, 2026) allows for dating the interview to mid-October 2026.

### What exactly did Zelenskyy say about the U.S. deal for Russian diesel fuel?

He doubted that this agreement would have the promised effect on prices in the U.S. fuel market. In a broader context (NBC interview), he categorized this deal as one of many decisions that, in his view, give Moscow the impression of receiving concessions without stopping the war.

### What is Zelenskyy's main appeal to the U.S. administration?

Redirect pressure from Ukraine to Russia: 'Better to pressure Putin, not me. Not me. I am not the aggressor.' According to him, Russia started the war, and responsibility for its continuation should not be shifted to Kyiv.

### How did Zelenskyy argue for the necessity of supporting Ukraine in terms of U.S. interests?

He stated that a weak Ukraine would allow Russia to move further into Europe and approach NATO countries, which would create additional risks and costs for America. 'We are defending Europe, not just ourselves,' he emphasized.