---
title: "Zuckerberg Against AI 'Braking': Meta Chief Backs NVIDIA and Challenges Anthropic's Arguments"
description: "In a post on X, Mark Zuckerberg spoke out against slowing down AI development, backing Jensen Huang from NVIDIA and challenging the arguments of Anthropic's head. He believes that market incentives and voluntary checks make state oversight redundant."
date: 2026-09-17T10:16:00.000Z
lang: en
url: https://xab.info/en/posts/zuckerberg-against-ai-slowdown-backs-nvidia
tags: [mark-zuckerberg, meta, artificial-intelligence, nvidia, jensen-huang, anthropic, openai]
publisher: "XAB.info"
---

# Zuckerberg Against AI 'Braking': Meta Chief Backs NVIDIA and Challenges Anthropic's Arguments

![Mark Zuckerberg speaking at a conference, supporting AI development and NVIDIA's position](https://xab.info/media/2026/09/18/cukerberg-protiv-zamedleniya-ii-podderzhal-nvidia/cukerberg-protiv-zamedleniya-ii-podderzhal-nvidia-1.webp)

## 🎯 Key Points

- Zuckerberg, in a post on X, backed Jensen Huang's position and challenged Dario Amodei's arguments about slowing down AI
- The Meta chief believes that economic incentives and voluntary checks (e.g., the delay of the Muse release) make state oversight redundant
- Amodei (Anthropic) and Altman (OpenAI) insist on preventive risk monitoring before features are deployed
- The dispute has touched politics and finance: Trump criticized calls for restraint, while investors fear a market correction

Mark Zuckerberg has publicly pushed back against calls to slow down the development of artificial intelligence. In a post on the social network X, the head of Meta endorsed Jensen Huang's position from NVIDIA and cast doubt on the arguments of Anthropic's Dario Amodei, who is calling for tighter control. This is reported by RBC-Ukraine, citing the Meta CEO's post.

### Economic Incentives Instead of State Oversight

According to Zuckerberg, AI developers have a natural economic incentive to build safe products: it is user trust and the alignment of systems with human values, he believes, that will determine the market success of algorithms. Violating these principles, the Meta chief argues, carries the risk of direct financial losses and legal liability for IT labs, making additional state oversight redundant.

### A Real-World Example from Meta and NVIDIA's Position

As an illustration, Zuckerberg cited the voluntary delay of the release of its own Muse technologies, explaining it as a need for additional security checks. "Directing the vast majority of compute resources toward serving people, rather than racing toward recursive self-improvement, is one of the best ways to ensure the safe development of this technology. Meta has taken on this responsibility, and other labs can do the same," he noted. Jensen Huang expressed a similar idea at the Salesforce Dreamforce conference, stating that existing legislation is entirely sufficient to hold companies accountable for the quality of their software.

### The Opposing Camp: Anthropic and OpenAI

In the camp of those advocating for restrictions remain Anthropic's Dario Amodei and OpenAI's Sam Altman. They insist that risk monitoring must precede the deployment of new features, while acknowledging the difficulty of coordinating safety measures amid fierce international competition. Thus, two opposing approaches have emerged in the industry: one places market incentives and voluntary commitments at the center, the other — preventive risk oversight before release.

### Political and Financial Resonance

The debate has gone beyond the tech community and touched the political and financial spheres. US President Donald Trump critically assessed calls to rein in the technology, naming effective state leadership as the main guarantor of safety. Amid the disputes among investors, fears have emerged of a possible stock market correction. That said, some analysts are convinced that shifting the focus from a relentless race of features to the stability and reliability of artificial intelligence will, in the long run, only strengthen the tech sector.

## 🔍 Fact-Check Verification

- [No Braking Possible: Zuckerberg Speaks Out Against AI Restrictions and Backs NVIDIA](https://www.rbc.ua/ukr/news/zagalmuvati-vdastsya-tsukerberg-vistupiv-1789634402.html) - Основной источник: пост CEO Meta в X, поддержка позиции Хуанга, оспаривание аргументов Амодея.
- [Huang and Zuckerberg Against 'Political Bans' on AI Development](https://www.goha.ru/huang-i-cukerberg-protiv-politicheskih-zapretov-razvitiya-ii-l5Z1DM) - Подтверждает совместную позицию Хуанга и Цукерберга против политических запретов.
- [Key Points by Morning: Zuckerberg and Huang Against Slowing AI, Oil Prices Fall](https://oninvest.com/article/glavnoe-k-utru-cukerberg-i-huang-protiv-zamedlenia-ii-neft-podesevela) - Подтверждает контекст спора о замедлении ИИ и финансовый резонанс.
- [Zuckerberg Does Not Want to Slow Down AI: He Backs the NVIDIA Chief's Position](https://news.finance.ua/ru/cukerberg-ne-hochet-zamedlyat-ii-on-podderzhal-poziciyu-glavy-nvidia) - Подтверждает ключевой тезис о поддержке позиции главы NVIDIA.

## ❓ FAQ

### Q: Whom did Zuckerberg back in the AI debate?
**A:** He backed Jensen Huang's position from NVIDIA and cast doubt on the arguments of Anthropic's head, Dario Amodei.

### Q: Why does Zuckerberg believe state oversight is redundant?
**A:** Because developers have an economic incentive to build safe products, and violations lead to losses and legal liability.

### Q: Who is pushing for stricter restrictions?
**A:** Anthropic's Dario Amodei and OpenAI's Sam Altman, who insist on risk monitoring before features are deployed.