The modern world, from banking transactions to ship navigation, relies on an invisible network of satellites. However, this vulnerable infrastructure could be destroyed by a single strike. Lieutenant General Michael Traut, Commander of the German Bundeswehr Space Command, outlined a scenario in an interview with Politico that previously seemed like the plot of a dystopian film: a nuclear explosion in space.

The "Starfire" scenario: a threat to orbit

General Traut assessed the probability of Russia developing nuclear weapons in space as an "extreme escalation scenario." According to him, at the very top of the escalation ladder, there is a suspicion that Moscow may be developing technologies to place a nuclear warhead in orbit. When asked about the realism of such plans, the Commander responded emotionlessly: "I cannot rule it out".

Traut cited the 1962 high-altitude nuclear test by the US, known as "Starfish Prime." If a similar explosion were to occur today, the consequences would be catastrophic. According to the German general's estimates, up to a third of all satellites in low Earth orbit could cease to function within a few weeks or months.

The destruction would not be limited to the elimination of the satellites themselves. The explosion would exacerbate the problem of space debris and trigger cascading collisions — the so-called Kessler syndrome. This could render certain orbital altitudes unusable for decades to come.

Infrastructure paralysis and the domino effect

The consequences of a nuclear explosion in space would not look like a strike on Earth, but the blow to modern societies would be crushing. Satellites ensure the operation of critical infrastructure:

  • Communication and telecommunications;
  • Navigation (GPS, GLONASS);
  • Banking and financial transactions;
  • Transport and logistics;
  • Weather forecasting;
  • Military targeting.

Loss of control over orbit means loss of control over these sectors. Traut noted that threats in space have already "developed significantly" in recent years. Electromagnetic interference and laser attacks have become a daily reality. A striking example is the jamming of GPS in the Baltic region, which is already affecting civil aviation and maritime transport.

Germany's response: from shield to active deterrence

Berlin's reaction to growing threats cannot be passive. "You do not go onto the arena with only a shield," Traut emphasized. He explained that real deterrence always requires an active, offensive component. At the same time, the general clarified: "offensive does not mean aggressive". Germany must have the ability to seize the initiative in a conflict.

This implies actions against the entire enemy infrastructure that ensures the operation of satellites — from ground control stations to communication jammers, and not just attacks in orbit.

Sovereign constellation and European partnership

To protect its interests, Germany plans to create its own military communications satellite constellation under the SATCOMBw 4 program. This decision is dictated by the growing demand of the Bundeswehr for secure communication channels.

It is important to note that Berlin does not view this program as competition to the EU's IRIS² secure communications system. On the contrary, the Commander called them complementary to each other. Germany's own constellation would relieve the load on the EU system, leaving more bandwidth for other users. Berlin also intends to attract as many European partners as possible to use this network, especially those countries that cannot afford to build their own constellation.

Intelligence on "dummy" warheads

The concerns of the German command are supported by data from allies. Previously, US intelligence warned that Russia could deploy nuclear weapons into orbit. US intelligence agencies suggest that Moscow is capable of launching even a "dummy" warhead to keep the West uncertain about its real capabilities.

According to intelligence data, work is being carried out in parallel on a satellite capable of carrying nuclear weapons directed directly against other satellites. In conditions where space is becoming a new arena of confrontation, the question of protecting orbital infrastructure is moving from the theoretical to the vital.