Vladimir Putin once again publicly commented on the course of systematic attacks on Ukrainian territory, stating that they are "effective and timely" and also help Russian military forces carry out their tasks directly on the line of combat confrontation. This is reported by RBC-Ukraine, citing the Smotri TV channel. According to the Kremlin leader, massive strikes on critical and civilian infrastructure allegedly have a direct impact on the situation at the front and facilitate the actions of occupying forces at the front line.

Tactics of combined attacks

Russian forces regularly carry out massive combined strikes on Ukrainian territory, employing attack drones, cruise and ballistic missiles. The aggressor's main targets remain the energy and critical infrastructure, as well as civilian facilities in various regions of the country. It is precisely such attacks, by the logic of the Russian leadership, that are supposed to undermine Ukraine's ability to hold its defense and ensure the supply of the front.

Contradictory data

Assessments of the nature of these strikes diverge sharply depending on the side. The Kremlin presents the combined attacks as a tool that "simplifies the fulfillment of tasks" at the front line and is a "timely" response. At the same time, First Deputy Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Serhiy Kylyta previously noted that Vladimir Putin is against peace negotiations and is betting on the terror of the civilian population in the cold season, expecting that Ukrainians will not be able to survive the next winter. Thus, what Moscow calls tactical effectiveness, Kyiv classifies as deliberate terror against civilians and an attempt to break public resistance through the destruction of the energy system.

Counter-actions and economic pressure

At the same time, the Defense Forces of Ukraine continue to carry out counter-strikes on targets on the territory of the aggressor country. According to available data, attacks on Russian industry and infrastructure are exerting a noticeable negative pressure on the Russian economy. However, as noted, the Kremlin leader publicly tries to downplay the scale of these consequences, maintaining in his statements the narrative of the "effectiveness" of his own strikes and ignoring the growing losses on his own territory.