Luhansk's Zorya has officially announced the signing of 31-year-old Luxembourg international striker Jerson Rodrigues. This is reported by Sport RBC.UA, citing the Luhansk club's press service. The player, widely known in Ukraine thanks to his long stint with Kyiv's Dynamo, moved to Viktor Skrypnyk's team on a free transfer — his contract with the Kyiv side ran from 2019 to 2025 and has since expired, making the forward a free agent. The terms of the new contract between Zorya and the footballer have not been disclosed, although it is already known that Rodrigues will wear the number 7 shirt on the pitch.
What is known about the transfer and contract terms
Rodrigues' move to Zorya has been structured as the signing of a free agent: the Luhansk club did not pay any transfer fee to the Kyiv side, since the striker's contract with Dynamo ended in 2025. Zorya's press service did not reveal the financial or other details of the deal, limiting itself to confirming the fact of the signing. The only publicly known condition was the squad number — 7 — which the forward will wear in UPL matches. For the Luhansk side, this is a reinforcement of the attack with an experienced foreign player who has international experience, which is particularly relevant given the team's current position in the standings.
The Dynamo era: titles, stats and scandals
Jerson Rodrigues' period in Kyiv became one of the most controversial in his career. Under his contract with Dynamo from 2019 to 2025, he won the Ukrainian championship, the domestic Cup and two Super Cups alongside the Kyiv side. In total, his record for the Kyiv club stands at 53 appearances, 9 goals and 4 assists. However, it was precisely this period that was remembered not only for on-pitch achievements but also for numerous off-field scandals, which saw the forward regularly sent out on loan. His loan record during this time includes France's Troyes, Turkey's Eyupspor and Sivasspor, Slovakia's Slovan, as well as clubs from Saudi Arabia, China and Thailand. In the photo provided as part of the material, Rodrigues is captured in Dynamo's white kit with blue stripes, the New Balance logo, the FAVBET sponsor inscription and the emblem of Ukraine — in the moment of carrying the ball at a stadium with paper fans in the stands.
Last club and the Luxembourg national team
Before joining Zorya, Jerson Rodrigues' last club was North Macedonia's Vardar, for whom in the current season he managed to make 2 appearances and provide 1 assist. In addition to his club career, the striker is one of the most experienced players of the Luxembourg national team: he has 72 caps and 23 goals to his name in the national shirt, making him one of the team's key scorers in its history. Such international experience and his age category (31 years old) position Rodrigues as a player capable of immediately fitting into Zorya's rotation and strengthening the competition up front.
What's next: a possible debut against Dynamo
At the time of publication, Viktor Skrypnyk's Luhansk Zorya sits 8th in the UPL standings, which makes reinforcing the attack a timely step. The moment of the newcomer's debut could also be symbolic: according to the publication, it may take place as early as September 19, when the Luhansk side will play a match against Kyiv's Dynamo — the very club for which Rodrigues played for six years. Such a setup will add an extra narrative to the encounter and attract additional attention from fans and the media.
Contradictory data
Publications from different outlets contain discrepancies in how the circumstances of Rodrigues' departure from Dynamo are interpreted. The main text and Zorya's press service state that the forward's contract with the Kyiv side ran from 2019 to 2025 and expired, meaning the move to Zorya was structured as the signing of a free agent. At the same time, a number of sources (in particular, Sport.ua) characterize the situation with the phrasing "kicked out of the club", emphasizing the scandalous nature of his time in Kyiv and the regular loan moves due to off-field incidents. Thus, formally the contract was fulfilled to the end, however the public rhetoric surrounding the player's departure contains an element of a "forced" end to the collaboration. Both versions coexist in the media landscape, and the final assessment of the nature of the parting with Dynamo remains a matter of interpretation.